Tuesday, January 31, 2012

The financialization of art

After last week discussions on the different types of investments, I came across this interesting article on Bloomberg which talked about how modern finance is ruining art. The article talks about the relationship of money and art and how change in the overall economy which went from industrial and consumer capitalism to finance capitalism mirrors the changes in art. According to the article art has gone through 3 stages: commodification, corporatization and financialization of art. The commodification of art began with the center of the art world moving from Europe to NYC and with the likes of Andy Warhol and Jeff Koons. The corporatization of art was when major corporations attempted to increase their prestige by purchasing and displaying art, even getting to the point where few enterprising artists transformed corporations to works of art. Finally the last stage was the financialization of art which relates majorly to our investments topic last week.

Just like mortgages have been securitized as collateralized mortgage obligations, now art is being treated like any other commodity and is purchased for speculative purposes. Investors are bundling works of art and they are selling shares of a hedge fund. This ways, investors can own an undivided interest in a group of works of arts, with the value based on the probability of its price performance within a specified timeframe. One example of this model is Fine Art Management Services, which speculates in art rather than stocks.

The article goes on to talk about how the process of getting to the financialization of art betrays the principal and values which have guided artists. Personally, I found it really interesting to see how art funds are now aiming to trade pieces of art the way hedge funds trade treasuries or gold, profiting from fees and gains. It would be interesting to see what the performance of this art funds is and if it can be considered a good alternative investment option.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-30/is-modern-finance-ruining-modern-art-part-1-commentary-by-mark-taylor.html

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-31/is-modern-finance-ruining-modern-art-part-2-commentary-by-mark-taylor.html


Upcoming Facebook IPO

In one of the most anticipated IPOs ever, Facebook is expected to file its papers with the SEC as early as this week. Though reluctant to take his company public for cultural reasons within the company, CEO Mark Zuckerberg feels as though the time is right; because they now have over 500 shareholders, they are required to make their books public anyway. This strategy makes sense because it is still uncertain to the public how profitable the company actually is.

The IPO could be for upwards of $10 billion, which would make it the largest U.S. internet IPO ever, and the fourth largest in U.S. history. Post-IPO valuation estimates for Facebook vary from $75 billion to $100 billion--about the same size as McDonald's and three to four times larger than Google was when the search giant debuted in 2004--a huge number for a company that is only eight years old. According to the Wall Street Journal, the determinants of the final valuation will be the demand for social media from investors, the European economy, and the overall health of the IPO market. Other recent internet IPOs for Groupon and Zynga have debuted with mediocre results, so it remains to be seen how the market reacts, though Facebook appears to be a separate beast that will debut with unprecedented hype. What is clear is that the venture capitalists, mutual funds, and other initial investors who have helped fund Facebook's rise to power will be walking away with billions of dollars (Zuckerberg himself is expected to be worth about $20 billion after the IPO). Regardless of what happens, this will continue to be one of the most fascinating stories to follow over the coming months.

To read more go here or here or here.

Below is a timeline of Facebook's valuation over time (source: Wall Street Journal):


How Facebook is currently being valued privately by mutual funds (source: Wall Street Journal):


Here are some related videos:

Until next week...

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Spoil Your Grandkids -- Another way to invest in life


Spoil Your Grandkids, Save Tax Bills -- Another way to invest in life

Everyone should start retirement planning no later than his or her first career job. Here comes a new idea about investments. Apart from investing in your own retirement plan, you might want to present your grandkids with a gift, which can help them realize their dreams and brighten their future. It can deduct your tax bills as well.

In this article, it offers some of the tax-advantaged avenues available for older taxpayers who wish to help pay for their grandkids' college costs.

When it comes to paying for college, grandparents can also reap substantial tax benefits on top of the enjoyment of watching their grandkids benefit from higher education.

Here is the introduction of the 529 plans- Qualified Tuition Programs

There are two types of qualified tuition programs, the college savings plan and the prepaid tuition plan.

College Savings Plan
College savings plans are established by a state or eligible educational institution, and allow individuals to make contributions in order to finance the beneficiary's (student's) higher education. The contributions are made to a college savings account and the balance in the account is determined by the performance of the underlying investments. This ultimately affects the amount of funds available to meet the beneficiary's eligible education expenses.

Prepaid Tuition Plans
Prepaid tuition plans, also known as prepaid education arrangements or prepaid tuition programs, provide a way for families to beat the cost of inflation by purchasing the future cost of tuition at today's rate. These plans are sold in units or by contract, and cover a given number of years of tuition or a certain number of credits. They are backed by the state and provide another low-risk alternative for estate-conscious donors who wish to shift large amounts of assets to heirs without reducing their unified credit. Drawbacks to these plans include stiff withdrawal penalties and a relatively low rate of return compared to other options such as college savings plans. Furthermore, prepaid tuition plans are generally only available for in-state residents and school alumni, and may also be limited to in-state public institutions. Some plans do not cover costs at private or out-of-state schools.

Limits
If used for qualified education expenses, all contributions accumulate on a tax-deferred basis and earnings are tax-free. Most states offer a tax deduction for residents who use their state's plan, and a special tax break for wealthy taxpayers seeking to reduce their taxable estates. Qualified tuition program rules stipulate that contributors can stack up as many as five annual gift tax exclusions on top of each other in a single year. For example, an individual could contribute up to $65,000 to a single qualified tuition program in 2011 without creating any gift tax as long as the money does not exceed the amount necessary for the child to complete their higher education. Married couples can contribute twice that amount.

These limits are applicable on a per-plan basis. So, couples seeking a tax-efficient transfer of assets could contribute up to $130,000 to several different beneficiaries in a single year. Furthermore, the beneficiary does not have to be a biological grandchild.  As a matter of fact, the beneficiary does not have to be related to the contributor. An older couple with no children can even choose to donate this amount to their neighbor's grandkids. 

Drawbacks
The primary drawback associated with qualified tuition programs is the penalty and taxation on the earnings included in any plan distribution that is not used for qualified education expenses. Nonqualified distributions are treated in the same way as early distributions from a retirement plan or annuity; they're both assessed a 10% early distribution penalty in addition to being counted as taxable income. However, the income and penalty is assessed only on the earnings. Any tax or penalty applies to the plan beneficiary and not to the contributor, which may be a major factor for donors to consider.

U.S. Savings Bonds
Conservative investors can find another education tax haven in bonds that are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The education bond program allows certain kinds of bonds to be exempted from taxation if the proceeds are used to fund higher education expenses. The interest generated from Series I bonds and EE bonds, zero-coupon bonds and STRIPS and Treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS), is eligible under this program, while Series H and HH bonds are not. However, several conditions must be met in order for this exemption to apply. Any eligible bond must have been issued after 1989 to an investor who was at least 24 years old at the time of issuance.

If the bonds are to be used to pay for a minor's higher education, the child must be the beneficiary on the bonds and cannot own them directly. Furthermore, the child must be claimed as a dependent on the parent's (or grandparent's) tax return. A single investor - or $60,000 per couple - in a given year to qualify for the exemption, can purchase no more than $30,000 of savings bonds. If these conditions are met, savings bonds can provide a more flexible source of college funding than 529 plans, as there is no penalty if the funds are used for a different purpose. However, the interest on the bonds will then become taxable.

Coverdell Education Savings Account                                               
Originally created as Education IRAs, these savings accounts were overhauled and expanded in 2002. They allow for an annual nondeductible contribution of $2,000 for each child up to the age of 18. The earnings grow tax-free, usually at the state and federal levels, as long as the IRA is used for qualified education expenses. However, the early distribution penalty and income tax are assessed on the earnings portion of any amount remaining in the account for 30 days or more after the beneficiary reaches age 30. The early distribution penalty does not apply to exceptions such as the death or disability of the beneficiary. The age 18 and age 30 limitations do not apply to beneficiaries with special needs. (Learn about these accounts by touring our Education Savings Account Tutorial.)

Education savings accounts differ from qualified tuition programs as contributions are aggregated per child in the same manner as IRA contributions. Four different family members cannot each make $2,000 contributions in the same year for the same beneficiary. Furthermore, contributions are counted toward the gift tax exclusion, which means that an individual who contributes $2,000 for tax year 2011 to these plans can only allocate another $10,000 as a nontaxable gift to a qualified tuition program for the same beneficiary.

Withdrawals from these accounts may also affect the taxpayer's ability to benefit from education tax credits. While the beneficiary may be able to claim the credit in the same year that the distribution is made from the education savings account, the distribution and the credit cannot be used to cover the same expenses.

The disadvantages inherent in these plans have made them much less popular than other avenues of saving, such as the qualified tuition programs.

The Bottom Line
There are several options for grandparents and other older taxpayers who want to reduce their income or estate tax while helping young ones pay for college. However, taxation is only one factor involved in choosing the right type of tuition assistance. Other issues, such as who controls the assets, and coordination with financial aid, must also be considered.





Pension Forecasts

After our discussion on Tuesday, and reading the chapter on pension funds I came across this article at the WSJ. It asks the question "Are Pension Forecasts Way Too Sunny?"
It goes on to compare pension fund managers with Warren Buffett. The fund managers do not come out well in the comparison, their "rosy hopes may not survive the collision with reality."
The fund managers at major companies expect stock returns between 12 & 16% while "
over the past 10 and 20 years, respectively, the Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index has returned 3.9% and 8% annually."
In contrast Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway pension plan has an overall expected return of 7.1% with stocks contributing a return of 8%-9%.
Who are you going to trust? Me,I'll stick with Buffett, as will the articles writer who says that investors "should leave the fantasies of higher returns to the professionals—who probably won't achieve them anyway."
These rosy return expectations may come back to bite the companies who will make up shortfalls out of future profits.
With all of this scary pension talk we need a song!